Many Christians these days get angry when people say “happy holidays” this time of year instead of “merry Christmas.” I’ve seen a few blogs, facebooks, and other forms of social media dedicated to being “politically incorrect” in their conviction to keep Christ in Christmas by saying “merry Christmas.” It’s hard to know how to react things like this. On the one hand, we Christians should be eager to confess Christ. But on the other hand, we are called to respect and love all people; even those who disagree with our religious views. But both of these arguments miss the point.
For we Christians, in the midst of our fighting about semantics, we have missed the true meaning of Advent and indeed, of Christmas. Advent is about weakness. Christmas is about the all powerful creator incarnated in the form of a weak, entirely dependent baby. As I discussed a few days ago, Christmas is about God’s self-emptying on our behalf.
It is rather disturbing to think of God as weak. We pray to him for power, miracles, healing, salvation, and many other things that require infinite strength. And it is good that we do this. But the Christmas season celebrates God’s subjecting himself to weakness on behalf of humanity.
Why are we uncomfortable with weakness? Why does uncertainty bother us the way that it does? And to ask the biggest question of them all, why does it bother Christianity to practice weakness during the Christmas season? Our cultural climate is one of extreme social Darwinism - the survival of the fittest. We build massive buildings, form powerful armies, and accumulate excessive amounts of wealth all to show that we are the dominant society. Historically, when our position on the world scale is in danger of losing power, we have been told that “our very way of life is at stake.”
This attitude has worked its way into the church. Churches hold growth seminars, spend untold amounts of money on stages and sound systems that would rival full-time rock bands, and practice Christianity is a way that shows power, strength, and confidence. The church is equally as Darwinist as the world as it relates to social structures. In recent years, Christianity and politics has been inseparable in American society. Christianity has adopted a place of power. Christianity has been climbing the social ladder, trying to show that it is fit enough to survive. Out of this comes the fight for Christmas. We insist on saying “merry Christmas” because it shows our unique slant on this time of year. We fight to “keep Christ in Christmas” because by doing so we ourselves climb another rung on the social ladder while those who are not Christians stay behind.
The ironic thing about all of this is that the harder we fight to “keep Christ in Christmas,” the more we remove him. If our main concern about keeping Christ in the celebration of Christmas has become to use one set of terminology over another, we have completely missed the point. Christmas is about the weakness of God. Christmas is about the creator lying in a cattle feeding trough, embodying perfect love in weakness for a people who only understood power.
Unless we speak of weakness in love, we take Christ out of Christmas regardless of what terminology we use. Jesus’ birth and his life bore witness to a “weak” love of identifying with outcasts, the homeless, the unloved, and the despised. Unless we do the same, we have taken Christ out of Christmas regardless of whether we say “merry Christmas” or “happy holidays.”

Some great thoughts brother!
ReplyDeleteThanks Martin!
ReplyDeleteWell said man.
ReplyDeleteI really don't understand why people get all up in arms about the whole Xmas thing, I think that in itself only shows a lack of confidence, a lack of faith, are we that insecure?
The fact is we have no idea what day Jesus was born, the season only serves to remind us of the incarnation. Besides it was a day of celebration long before we Christianized it.
Pretty Good. My only question is how does one put this into practice? You are right in saying that in trying to protect the words that recognize Christ, we have rejected Christ and the model he was setting for us. As Christians do you recommend us not responding? Or responding but in a loving manner that shows what we believe but we don't think of ourselves higher than someone who says happy holidays? I'm asking because we are so tied up with our "strength" that we don't understand what it means to talk or act in love little less "weakness".
ReplyDeleteRobierto,
ReplyDeleteYou ask a great question. I think that there is a difference between calmly telling someone what you believe and "shoving it in their face." I say it like this only because all of the instances I've seen of the clash between "merry Christmas" and "happy holidays" has been from Christians who immediately and negatively respond when they hear "happy holidays." I think exemplifying weakness in this situation would be to respond with "happy holidays" and then strike up a conversation and ask the other person which holiday they celebrate. I don't think weakness can be separated from relationships. But when we immediately start condemning a person for saying "happy holidays," we don't take much time to find out their story. Hope this helps!
Geoff
I think one thing to be wary of is ascribing a human word to God. Too often, our minds are unable to separate a holy and perfect weakness from a human and sinful weakness. Yes, when Jesus was born, he was wholly dependent on Joseph and Mary. He was fully man. Yet he was also fully God. That in itself changes the very definition of His weakness. His brand of weakness is different than ours. And if we get them confused, we de-God the very God we are trying to defend.
ReplyDeleteThere is something to be said for people that staunchly defend their faith. And also for those that humbly draw others out. Just as the Word will not return void, God is using both of them to draw others to Him. Some people need to be chastised for their use of "happy holidays" and until someone stands up to "Keep Christ in Christmas", they will continue in ignorance.
If we don't defend our beliefs, then who will?
Jonny,
ReplyDeleteI partially agree. But when was the last time "merry Christmas" was humbly and lovingly defended in a public forum?
What I'm trying to say is that the way we have defended Christmas has been a polemic about semantics. And that misses the point. But something that I think I forgot to point out in the actual post is that this weakness is weakness on behalf of others. It's not just being weak because its more effective than strength, it's because in weakness their is strength that the strong do not know. I.e., when someone hits you turn the other cheek, if someone forces you to go one mile, go two, etc. In this instance, the weakness of God was the most powerful thing humanity has ever experienced, and those who follow Jesus are called to exhibit this same kind of weakness. And I would contend with you that the only language that i have to describe God is human language because I am a human and God made himself known to humans.
But my main point in all of this is that when we argue to keep the word Christ in Christmas in the ways that I've seen it done (I.e., walking into stores and yelling because people said "happy holidays," calling someone a pinhead on national TV because they said "holiday tree) we take Christ out of Christmas more than he already was.
Forgive the spelling errors please lol
ReplyDelete